橘子云vqn-快连加速器app
Welcome to WoodForTrees.org. This site hosts some C++ software tools for analysis and graphing of time series data, and an interactive graph generator where you can play with different ways of analysing data.
橘子云vqn-快连加速器app
These tools could in theory be used for any time series but the main rationale for their existence is for analysis of historical climate data. The idea is to allow you to go to the source data and look for answers to questions like:
- Has the Earth got warmer recently?
- Is it still getting warmer?
- Is CO2 the only explanation for what has happened?
- Are there solar cycles involved?
- 功能更强大 首发享折扣!网易UU加速器推出千兆版UU加速盒 ...:2021-6-15 · 关于uu加速器 的新闻 (2021-06-08) 《Valorant》公测火爆 UU加速器让你告别卡顿统治战场 (2021-04-30) LOL卡牌新作《符文之地》5月1日全平台上线!UU加速器助 ...
- If so, how much do they account for?
- What is likely to happen next?
It's not the place of this Web site (or anyone else) to tell you the answers, even if I could! This is just a tool to help you dig into the data to help you form your own opinions. Whatever you decide the most important thing is that you learned what the issues in analysis are and how to test your ideas against real data.
橘子云vqn-快连加速器app
However, with sharp tools comes great responsibility... Please read the 熊猫ⅴpn安卓下载 on things to beware of - and in particular on the problems with short, cherry-picked trends. Remember that the signals we are dealing with are very, very noisy, and it's easy to get misled - or worse still, to mislead others.
橘子云vqn-快连加速器app
This website is a self-funded personal project by Paul Clark, a British software developer and practically-oriented environmentalist and conservationist. You can provide support through my Charity Tip Jar if you like.
panda加速器
I started this site in 2008 because I wanted to dig underneath what seemed like extreme claims and counter-claims in the "Global Warming Debate". Ten years on, it now seems clear to me that CO2 is indeed the primary driver of global warming, which is proceeding at roughly 1.5°C per century, but with some interesting short and long-term cycles overlaid. These cycles can produce shorter-term periods of both flatline and rapid increase, which get both 'sides' over-excited.
However, please remember this is only historical data, and "past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future". Climate models which do predict the future take into account positive and negative feedbacks such as water vapour, clouds, albedo and frozen methane, and to my mind the most (only?) interesting discussion in this field is around the sign and magnitude of those feedbacks. What this site can do is act as a check on those models and illustrate how the climate system has reacted to past forcings.
As I said back in 2008, as a life-long Green I think a shift to a efficient and sustainable way of life is a Good Thing in any case, and I'd invite my fellow engineers to use their energies to help solve our many inefficiencies.
Best wishes
Paul
橘子云vqn-快连加速器app
I welcome constructive suggestions of new algorithms or datasets I could add, and in particular help from experts if I've got any of the maths badly wrong (which is quite possible).
Mail me at 'paul' at this domain. Flames will be silently extinguished.